Economic evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme in Cumbria, UK

Author:

Whittaker William1,Goodwin Michaela2ORCID,Bashir Saima1,Sutton Matt1,Emsley Richard3,Kelly Michael P.4,Tickle Martin2ORCID,Walsh Tanya2,Pretty Iain A.2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care University of Manchester Manchester UK

2. Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health The University of Manchester Manchester UK

3. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

4. Department of Public Health and Primary Care University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe addition of fluoride to community drinking water supplies has been a long‐standing public health intervention to improve dental health. However, the evidence of cost‐effectiveness in the UK currently lacks a contemporary focus, being limited to a period with higher incidence of caries. A water fluoridation scheme in West Cumbria, United Kingdom, provided a unique opportunity to study the contemporary impact of water fluoridation. This study evaluates the cost‐effectiveness of water fluoridation over a 5–6 years follow‐up period in two distinct cohorts: children exposed to water fluoridation in utero and those exposed from the age of 5.MethodsCost‐effectiveness was summarized employing incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICER, cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained). Costs included those from the National Health Service (NHS) and local authority perspective, encompassing capital and running costs of water fluoridation, as well as NHS dental activity. The measure of health benefit was the QALY, with utility determined using the Child Health Utility 9‐Dimension questionnaire. To account for uncertainty, estimates of net cost and outcomes were bootstrapped (10 000 bootstraps) to generate cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analysis performed with alternative specifications.ResultsThere were 306 participants in the birth cohort (189 and 117 in the non‐fluoridated and fluoridated groups, respectively) and 271 in the older school cohort (159 and 112, respectively). In both cohorts, there was evidence of small gains in QALYs for the fluoridated group compared to the non‐fluoridated group and reductions in NHS dental service cost that exceeded the cost of fluoridation. For both cohorts and across all sensitivity analyses, there were high probabilities (>62%) of water fluoridation being cost‐effective with a willingness to pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY.ConclusionsThis analysis provides current economic evidence that water fluoridation is likely to be cost‐effective. The findings contribute valuable contemporary evidence in support of the economic viability of water fluoridation scheme.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. WHO.https://www.who.int/health‐topics/oral‐health#tab=tab_1Accessed 03 May 2022.2022.

2. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network.http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd‐results‐toolAccessed 27 April 2022.

3. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge

4. Forty years of national surveys: An overview of children's dental health from 1973-2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3