Dietary supplements, guideline alignment and biochemical nutrient status in pregnancy: Findings from the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study

Author:

Gallo Linda A.12ORCID,Steane Sarah E.23ORCID,Young Sophia L.1ORCID,de Jersey Susan45ORCID,Schoenaker Danielle A. J. M.678ORCID,Borg Danielle J.3ORCID,Lockett Jack3ORCID,Collins Clare E.910,Perkins Anthony V.1ORCID,Kumar Sailesh3ORCID,Clifton Vicki L.3ORCID,Wilkinson Shelley A.1112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health University of the Sunshine Coast Petrie QLD Australia

2. School of Biomedical Sciences The University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia

3. Mater Research Institute The University of Queensland South Brisbane QLD Australia

4. Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Metro North Hospital and Health Service Brisbane QLD Australia

5. Centre for Health Services Research The University of Queensland Herston QLD Australia

6. School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK

7. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre University of Southampton Southampton UK

8. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton NHS Southampton UK

9. School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Callaghan NSW Australia

10. Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton Heights NSW Australia

11. School of Pharmacy The University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia

12. Department of Obstetric Medicine Mater Mothers Hospital South Brisbane QLD Australia

Abstract

AbstractIn high‐income nations, multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation during pregnancy is a common practice. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics associated with supplement use and daily dose of supplemental nutrients consumed in pregnancy, and whether guideline alignment and nutrient status are related to supplement use. The Queensland Family Cohort is a prospective, Australian observational longitudinal study. Maternal characteristics, nutrient intake from food and supplements, and biochemical nutrient status were assessed in the second trimester (n = 127). Supplement use was reported by 89% of participants, of whom 91% reported taking an MMN supplement. Participants who received private obstetric care, had private health insurance and had greater alignment to meat/vegetarian alternatives recommendations were more likely to report MMN supplement use. Private obstetric care and general practitioner shared care were associated with higher daily dose of supplemental nutrients consumed compared with midwifery group practice. There was high reliance on supplements to meet nutrient reference values for folate, iodine and iron, but only plasma folate concentrations were higher in MMN supplement versus nonsupplement users. Exceeding the upper level of intake for folic acid and iron was more likely among combined MMN and individual supplement/s users, and associated with higher plasma concentrations of the respective nutrients. Given the low alignment with food group recommendations and potential risks associated with high MMN supplement use, whole food diets should be emphasized. This study confirms the need to define effective strategies for optimizing nutrient intake in pregnancy, especially among those most vulnerable where MMN supplement use may be appropriate.

Funder

Griffith University

Queensland University of Technology

University of the Sunshine Coast

University of Queensland

Mater Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference56 articles.

1. Comparison of Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS) and Plasma Carotenoid Concentrations: A Validation Study in Adults

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1998).National nutrition survey: Nutrient intakes and physical measurements.

3. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (2020).Pregnancy care guidelines: Nutrition and physical activity. Retrieved from:https://www.health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines/part-c-lifestyle-considerations/nutrition-and-physical-activity#112-nutritional-supplements

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022a). Maternity models of care in Australia. Retrieved from:https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/maternity-models-of-care/contents/what-do-maternity-models-of-care-look-like/designated-and-collaborative-carers

5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022b). Australia's mothers and babies. Retrieved from:https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies/contents/baby-outcomes

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3