Implant survival in the anterior mandible: A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Pedrinaci Ignacio12ORCID,Sun Teresa Chanting34ORCID,Sanz‐Alonso Mariano25,Sanz‐Esporrin Javier25ORCID,Hamilton Adam16ORCID,Gallucci German O.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Section of Graduate Periodontology, School of Dentistry University Complutense Madrid Spain

3. Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry National Defense Medical Center and Tri‐Service General Hospital Taipei Taiwan

4. Department of Periodontology Mackay Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan

5. ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri‐implant Diseases) Research Group University Complutense Madrid Spain

6. Division of Oral Restorative and Rehabilitative Sciences University of Western Australia Perth Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study aims to report the implant survival rate of dental implants of partially dentate patients in the anterior mandible and the potential risk indicators for implant failure.Materials and MethodsPatients with implant‐supported restorations of single or multiple teeth in the anterior mandible restored with fixed partial implant‐supported restorations were evaluated. Patient demographic data, implant placement timing, and loading protocol, biological and/or technical complications at the time of the last clinical and radiographic follow‐up visit were registered. Survival rate, success rate, and potential risk indicators for implant failure were calculated.ResultsA total of 108 patients and 186 implants with a mean follow‐up period of 5.48 years (0.1–11.34 years) were included. The 11.3‐year cumulative survival rate was 90.9%. Immediate implant placement (OR = 2.75) (p = .08) and immediate implant loading (OR = 8.8) (p = .02*) indicated a higher risk of failure than late implant placement or loading. When combining both categories (type 1A), an OR = 10.59 (p = .04*) for implant failure was found compared to category 4C. Implants placed following static—computer‐assisted implant surgery (S‐CAIS) showed less risk of failure compared to freehand implant placement (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.02–1.37) (p = .09).ConclusionsThe survival rate of implants placed in the anterior mandible was considerably low (90.9%). S‐CAIS, late placement, and conventional loading are protective factor against implant failure in the anterior mandible.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3