The efficacy of implant surface decontamination using chemicals during surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Wilensky Asaf1,Shapira Lior1ORCID,Limones Alvaro2ORCID,Martin Conchita34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

2. Department of Conservative and Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain

3. Department of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain

4. BIOCRAN Research group Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractAimTo answer the following PICOS question: “In adult patients with peri‐implantitis, what is the efficacy of surgical therapy with chemical surface decontamination of implant surfaces in comparison with surgical therapy alone or surgery with placebo decontamination, on probing pocket depth (PD) reduction and bleeding on probing (BoP)/suppuration on probing (SoP), in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and non‐RCTs with at least 6 months of follow‐up?”Materials and MethodsSix databases were searched from their inception up to 20 May 2022. Data on clinical outcome variables were pooled and analysed using mean differences (MDs), risk ratios (RRs), or risk differences (RDs) as appropriate, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prediction intervals (PIs) in the case of significant heterogeneity. Primary outcomes were determined as changes in PD and BoP/SoP. Secondary outcomes were radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL), implant loss, and disease resolution. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022325603.ResultsSix RCTs—two with moderate, three with high, and one with low risk of bias (RoB)—were included. These studies test the adjunctive effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT), chlorhexidine (CHX), and administration of local antibiotics (LAbs) during surgery on the clinical outcome. In a single 12‐month study, the adjunctive use of local antibiotics showed a clinically relevant reduction of PD [MD = 1.44; 95%CI (0.40 to −2.48)] and MBL [MD = 1.21; 95%CI (0.44–1.98); one trial, 32 participants]. PDT showed a small but significant reduction in BoP [MD = 7.41%; 95%CI (0.81–14.00); p = 0.028; two trials; 42 participants]. Treatment with CHX resulted in no significant changes in PD, BoP, or MBL compared to placebo (saline solution). None of the interventions affected disease resolution and implant loss. Certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcome measures assessed.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this systematic review and the meta‐analysis, adjunctive use of chemicals such as PDT, CHX, and LAbs for surface decontamination during surgery of peri‐implantitis cannot be recommended as superior to standard debridement procedures (mechanical debridement with or without saline).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Periodontics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3