Affiliation:
1. Biomaterials and Technology, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel Basel Switzerland
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe composition of universal adhesives is highly diverse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of a composite with five different universal adhesives to human enamel and dentin.Materials and MethodsThe shear bond strength of a composite (G‐aenial Universal Injectable) to human enamel and dentin was tested in selective enamel etching mode before and after thermocyclic aging (10,000 cycles) using five different universal adhesive systems (Adhese Universal VivaPen, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, G‐Premio Bond, Prime&Bond active, and Scotchbond Universal Plus). Two‐bottle systems (OptiBond FL and G2‐Bond Universal) were used as control. Scanning electron microscopy was conducted of the bonding interface.ResultsSignificant differences in shear bond strength values were found among the five evaluated universal adhesives. Lowest shear bond strength values were observed for 2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA)‐free systems. Thermocyclic aging did not significantly reduce shear bond strength values indicating that the initial bond remains stable.ConclusionsThe clinical use of universal adhesives Adhese Universal VivaPen, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, and Scotchbond Universal Plus can be encouraged as they provided comparable or even better shear bond strength values than the two‐bottle controls.Clinical SignificanceUniversal adhesives that were developed for the same indication and approved for clinical use demonstrated variety in shear bond strength values. When applied in the selective enamel etching mode, a stable bond can be expected from adhesives containing HEMA and monomers with phosphate groups.