Affiliation:
1. Section of Dentistry, Department of Surgery The Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi Pakistan
Abstract
AbstractBackground/ObjectiveA contemporary concept states that dental midline deviation towards the direction of facial flow line (FFL) can mask the compromised smile esthetics. This study aimed to identify a range of midline deviations that can be perceived towards or away from the FFL influencing smile esthetics.Materials and MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted using a frontal smile photograph of an adult female. The photograph was altered on Adobe Photoshop software into six different photographs by deviating the dental midlines towards and away from the FFL. A constant deviation of chin towards the left side was incorporated in all the photographs. Forty‐three laypersons (LP) and dental professionals (DPs) evaluated those photographs. Independent t‐test was used to compare the perception of dental midline deviation between LP and DPs. Simple linear regression was run to identify the factors associated with the scoring.ResultsA statistically significant difference was observed for picture two with 4 mm towards FFL in the perception of midline deviation between LP and DPs. LP could not perceive the midline deviations up to 4 mm while DPs were able to perceive deviations above 2 mm. The greater the age the better the scores were and female raters had a greater inclination towards poor scores.ConclusionsFrom 2 to 4 mm of midline deviation towards the FFL can be tolerated by LP and DPs.Clinical SignificanceThese findings underscore the importance of considering facial symmetry in orthodontic and cosmetic dental treatments to optimize smile esthetics.
Reference28 articles.
1. Symmetry and asymmetry analysis and its implications to computer-aided diagnosis: A review of the literature
2. Management of Facial Asymmetry
3. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study;Rossi M;Angle Orthod,2003
4. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina;Severt TR;Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg,1997
5. Facial asymmetry: a current review