Alternative SNP weighting for multi‐step and single‐step genomic BLUP in the presence of causative variants

Abstract

AbstractThe accuracy of genetic selection in dairy can be increased by the adoption of new technologies, such as the inclusion of sequence data. In simulation studies, assigning different weights to causative single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers led to better predictions depending on the genomic prediction method used. However, it is still not clear how the weights should be calculated. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a multi‐step method (GBLUP) and single‐step GBLUP with simulated data using regular SNP, causatives variants (QTN) and the combination of both. Additionally, we compared the accuracies of all previous scenarios using alternatives for SNP weighting. The data were simulated assuming a single trait with a heritability of 0.3. The effective population size (Ne) was approximately 200. The pedigree contained 440,000 animals, and approximately 16,800 individuals were genotyped. A total of 49,974 SNP markers were evenly placed throughout the genome, and 100, 1000 and 2000 causative QTN were simulated. Both GBLUP and ssGBLUP were used in this study. We evaluated quadratic and nonlinear SNP weights in addition to the unweighted G. The inclusion of QTN to panels led to significant accuracy gains. Nonlinear A was demonstrated to be superior to quadratic weighting and unweighted approaches; however, results from Nonlinear A were dependent on the equation parameters. The unweighted approach was more suitable for less polygenic scenarios. Finally, SNP weighting might help elucidate trait architecture features based on changes in the accuracy of genomic prediction.