Validating administratively derived frailty scores for use in Veterans Health Administration emergency departments

Author:

Dev Sharmistha123ORCID,Gonzalez Andrew A.24,Coffing Jessica1,Slaven James E.5,Dev Shantanu26,Taylor Stan1,Ballard Carrie1,Hastings S. Nicole789ORCID,Bravata Dawn M.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Health Information and Communication Roudebush VA Medical Center Indianapolis Indiana USA

2. Regenstrief Institute Indianapolis Indiana USA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA

4. Department of Surgery Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA

5. Department of Biostatistics Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis Indianapolis Indiana USA

6. Department of Computer Science The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

7. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation Durham VA Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA

8. Department of Medicine Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

9. Department of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesFrailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by decreased physiologic reserve that diminishes the ability to respond to stressors such as acute illness. Veterans Health Administration (VA) emergency departments (ED) are the primary venue of care for Veterans with acute illness and represent key sites for frailty recognition. As questionnaire‐based frailty instruments can be cumbersome to implement in the ED, we examined two administratively derived frailty scores for use among VA ED patients.MethodsThis national retrospective cohort study included all VA ED visits (2017–2020). We evaluated two administratively derived scores: the Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score and the VA Frailty Index (VA‐FI). We categorized all ED visits across four frailty groups and examined associations with outcomes of 30‐day and 90‐day hospitalization and 30‐day, 90‐day, and 1‐year mortality. We used logistic regression to assess the model performance of the CAN score and the VA‐FI.ResultsThe cohort included 9,213,571 ED visits. With the CAN score, 28.7% of the cohort were classified as severely frail; by VA‐FI, 13.2% were severely frail. All outcome rates increased with progressive frailty (p‐values for all comparisons < 0.001). For example, for 1‐year mortality based on the CAN score frailty was determined as: robust, 1.4%; prefrail, 3.4%; moderately frail, 7.0%; and severely frail, 20.2%. Similarly, for 90‐day hospitalization based on VA‐FI, frailty was determined as prefrail, 8.3%; mildly frail, 15.3%; moderately frail, 29.5%; and severely frail, 55.4%. The c‐statistics for CAN score models were higher than for VA‐FI models across all outcomes (e.g., 1‐year mortality, 0.721 vs. 0.659).ConclusionsFrailty was common among VA ED patients. Increased frailty, whether measured by CAN score or VA‐FI, was strongly associated with hospitalization and mortality and both can be used in the ED to identify Veterans at high risk for adverse outcomes. Having an effective automatic score in VA EDs to identify frail Veterans may allow for better targeting of scarce resources.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3