Supportive and collaborative interdependence: Distinguishing residents’ contributions within health care teams

Author:

Sebok‐Syer Stefanie S.1ORCID,Lingard Lorelei2ORCID,Panza Michael3,Van Hooren Tamara A.4,Rassbach Caroline E.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

2. Department of Medicine and Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

3. Centre for Education Research and Innovation Western University London Ontario Canada

4. Department of Pediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

5. Department of Pediatrics Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIndividual assessments disregard team contributions, while team assessments disregard an individual's contributions. Interdependence has been put forth as a conceptual bridge between our educational traditions of assessing individual performance and our imminent challenge of assessing team‐based performance without losing sight of the individual. The purpose of this study was to develop a more refined conceptualisation of interdependence to inform the creation of measures that can assess the interdependence of residents within health care teams.MethodsFollowing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted 49 semi‐structured interviews with various members of health care teams (e.g. physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers and patients) across two different clinical specialties—Emergency Medicine and Paediatrics—at two separate sites. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively. Constant comparative inductive analysis was used, and coding consisted of three stages: initial, focused and theoretical.ResultsWe asked participants to reflect upon interdependence and describe how it exists in their clinical setting. All participants acknowledged the existence of interdependence, but they did not view it as part of a linear spectrum where interdependence becomes independence. Our analysis refined the conceptualisation of interdependence to include two types: supportive and collaborative. Supportive interdependence occurs within health care teams when one member demonstrates insufficient expertise to perform within their scope of practice. Collaborative interdependence, on the other hand, was not triggered by lack of experience/expertise within an individual's scope of practice, but rather recognition that patient care requires contributions from other team members.ConclusionIn order to assess a team's collective performance without losing sight of the individual, we need to capture interdependent performances and characterise the nature of such interdependence. Moving away from a linear trajectory where independence is seen as the end goal can also help support efforts to measure an individual's competence as an interdependent member of a health care team.

Funder

National Board of Medical Examiners

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3