Three patterns of symptom communication between patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit: A fieldwork study

Author:

Nyhagen Ragnhild12ORCID,Egerod Ingrid34ORCID,Rustøen Tone12,Lerdal Anners56ORCID,Kirkevold Marit27

Affiliation:

1. Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

2. Department of Nursing Science Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway

3. Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

4. Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway

6. Research Department Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital Oslo Norway

7. Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway

Abstract

AbstractAimTo describe different patterns of communication aimed at preventing, identifying and managing symptoms between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit.DesignWe conducted a fieldwork study with triangulation of participant observation and individual interviews.MethodsParticipant observation of nine patients and 50 clinicians: nurses, physiotherapists and physicians. Subsequent individual face‐to‐face interviews with nine of the clinicians, and six of the patients after they had regained their ability to speak and breathe spontaneously, were fully alert and felt well enough to sit through the interview.FindingsSymptom communication was found to be an integral part of patient care. We identified three communication patterns: (1) proactive symptom communication, (2) reactive symptom communication and (3) lack of symptom communication. The three patterns co‐existed in the cases and the first two complemented each other. The third pattern represents inadequate management of symptom distress.ConclusionRecognition of symptoms in non‐speaking intensive care patients is an important skill for clinicians. Our study uncovered three patterns of symptom communication, two of which promoted symptom management. The third pattern suggested that clinicians did not always acknowledge the symptom distress.Implications for Patient CareProactive and reactive symptom assessment of non‐speaking patients require patient verification when possible. Improved symptom prevention, identification and management require a combination of sound clinical judgement and attentiveness towards symptoms, implementation and use of relevant assessment tools, and implementation and skill building in augmentative and alternative communication.ImpactThis study addressed the challenges of symptom communication between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit. Our findings may have an impact on patients and clinicians concerned with symptom management in intensive care units.Reporting MethodWe used the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research.Patient ContributionA user representative was involved in the design of the study.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3