Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study

Author:

,de Onis Mercedes

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To assess differences in length/height among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) and to evaluate the appropriateness of pooling data for the purpose of constructing a single international growth standard. Methods: The MGRS collected growth data and related information from 8440 affluent children from widely differing ethnic backgrounds and cultural settings (Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the USA). Eligibility criteria included breastfeeding, no maternal smoking and environments supportive of unconstrained growth. The study combined longitudinal (birth to 24 mo) and cross‐sectional (18–71 mo) components. For the longitudinal component, mother–infant pairs were enrolled at delivery and visited 21 times over the next 2 y. Rigorous methods of data collection and standardized procedures were applied across study sites. We evaluate the total variability of length attributable to sites and individuals, differences in length/height among sites, and the impact of excluding single sites on the percentiles of the remaining pooled sample. Results: Proportions of total variability attributable to sites and individuals within sites were 3% and 70%, respectively. Differences in length and height ranged from −0.33 to +0.49 and −0.41 to +0.46 standard deviation units (SDs), respectively, most values being below 0.2 SDs. Differences in length on exclusion of single sites ranged from −0.10 to +0.07, −0.07 to +0.13, and −0.25 to +0.09 SDs, for the 50th, 3rd and 97th percentiles, respectively. Corresponding values for height ranged from −0.09 to +0.08, −0.12 to +0.13, and −0.15 to +0.07 SDs. Conclusion: The striking similarity in linear growth among children in the six sites justifies pooling the data and constructing a single international standard from birth to 5 y of age.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 194 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3