Regional geometric differences between regurgitant and non‐regurgitant mitral valves in patients with coronary artery disease

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveDemonstrate that regional geometric differences exist between regurgitant and non‐regurgitant mitral valves (MV's) in patients with coronary artery disease and due to the heterogenous and regional nature of ischemic remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), that the available anatomical reserve and likelihood of developing mitral regurgitation (MR) is variable in non‐regurgitant MV's in patients with CAD.MethodsIn this retrospective, observational study intraoperative three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic data was analyzed in patients undergoing coronary revascularization with MR (IMR group) and without MR (NMR group). Regional geometric differences between both groups were assessed and MV reserve which was defined as the increase in antero‐posterior (AP) annular diameter from baseline that would lead to coaptation failure was calculated in three zones of the MV from antero‐lateral (zone 1), middle (zone 2), and posteromedial (zone 3).Measurements and Main ResultsThere were 31 patients in the IMR group and 93 patients in the NMR group. Multiple regional geometric differences existed between both groups. Most significantly patients in the NMR group had significantly larger coaptation length and MV reserve than the IMR group in zones 1 (p‐value = .005, .049) and 2 (p‐value = .00, .00), comparable between the two groups in zone 3 (p‐value = .436, .513). Depletion of the MV reserve was associated with posterior displacement of the coaptation point in zones 2 and 3.ConclusionsThere are significant regional geometric differences between regurgitant and non‐regurgitant MV's in patients with coronary artery disease. Due to regional variations in available anatomical reserve and the risk of coaptation failure in patients with CAD, absence of MR is not synonymous with normal MV function.