The effect of ultrasonic and multisonic irrigation on root canal microbial communities: An ex vivo study

Author:

Park Ki Hong1,Ordinola‐Zapata Ronald1ORCID,Noblett W. Craig1,Lima Bruno P.2ORCID,Staley Christopher3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Endodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, School of Dentistry University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

2. Division of Basic Sciences, Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

3. Division of Basic & Translational Research, Department of Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractAimTo analyse the effect of ultrasonic irrigant activation (UIA) and the GentleWave (GW) multisonic irrigation (GW) with minimal instrumentation on the root canal microbial diversity in an ex vivo model that used extracted molars with a history of pulp necrosis.MethodologyTwenty‐three mandibular molars were prepared ex vivo for collection of superficial (surface control), pre‐treatment and post‐treatment samples 24 h after extraction. Samples were divided into two groups: UIA using 6% NaOCl (n = 11) and GW group (n = 12). All samples were processed using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and 16S rRNA next‐generation sequencing to measure microbial diversity before and after the antimicrobial treatment. For qPCR, a t‐test (α = .05) was used to compare the log10 reduction. The Chao1 and Shannon indices evaluated alpha diversity. Differences in community composition (beta diversity) were evaluated by analysis of similarity (ANOSIM). Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni corrections was performed to evaluate the differences in abundances genera in the samples.ResultsQuantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction revealed an estimated 1.6 and 2.6 log10 reduction for UIA and GW groups respectively (p = .048). An average of 5 ± 4 and 3 ± 5 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were found in surface's samples in the UIA and GW group respectively. These values were significantly lower (p < .001) compared to the number of preoperative OTUs in those groups (155 ± 79 and 187 ± 121). In assessing beta diversity, there were no significant differences found in pre‐treatment samples (R = .090, p = .070 ANOSIM with Bonferroni corrections). Also, no significant differences in community composition were observed in post‐treatment samples (R = −.05, p = .829). After treatment, there was a significant reduction of Eubacterium using conventional treatment with UIA and a significant reduction of Prevotella using minimal instrumentation with GW irrigation (p = .007 and p = .002 respectively).ConclusionQuantitative PCR analysis revealed a significant reduction in microbial load for GW group. Overall, diversity changes were similar between UIA and GW irrigation in this ex vivo model that used extracted teeth with a history of pulp necrosis. OTUs obtained from the surface sample were negligible and did not affect the statistical outcome of the study.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3