The association between epidural labour analgesia and postpartum depression: a randomised controlled trial

Author:

Tan H. S.12,Tan C. W.12ORCID,Sultana R.3,Chen H. Y.45,Chua T.45,Rahman N.67,Gandhi M.36,Sia A. T. H.12,Sng B. L.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women's Anaesthesia KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore

2. Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Sciences Academic Clinical Program Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore

3. Centre for Quantitative Medicine Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore

4. Department of Psychological Medicine KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore

5. Paediatrics Academic Clinical Program Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore

6. Department of Biostatistics Singapore Clinical Research Institute Singapore Singapore

7. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

Abstract

SummaryThere is conflicting evidence regarding the association between epidural labour analgesia and risk of postpartum depression. Most previous studies were observational trials with limited ability to account for confounders. We aimed to determine if epidural analgesia was associated with a significant change in the incidence of postpartum depression in this randomised controlled trial. We enrolled women aged 21–50 years old with a singleton fetus ≥ 36 weeks gestation. Patients were advised regarding available labour analgesic modalities during enrolment (epidural block; intramuscular pethidine; nitrous oxide; or intravenous remifentanil). On request for analgesia, patients were offered the modality that they had been allocated randomly to first. Blinded investigators recorded patient and obstetric characteristics within 24 h of delivery and assessed for postpartum depression at 6–10 weeks following delivery using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (score ≥ 13 considered positive for postpartum depression). The modified intention‐to‐treat population consisted of all patients who received any form of labour analgesia, while per‐protocol consisted of patients who received their randomised modality as their first form of labour analgesia. Of 881 parturients allocated randomly (epidural n = 441, non‐epidural n = 440), we analysed 773 (epidural n = 389, non‐epidural n = 384); 62 (15.9%) of women allocated to epidural group developed postpartum depression compared with 65 (16.9%) women allocate to the non‐epidural group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postpartum depression between the two groups (adjusted risk difference (95%CI) 1.6 (‐3.0–6.3%), p = 0.49). Similar results were obtained with per‐protocol analysis (adjusted risk difference (95%CI) ‐1.0 (‐8.3–6.3%), p = 0.79). We found no significant difference in the risk of postpartum depression between patients who received epidural labour analgesia and those who utilised non‐epidural analgesic modalities.

Funder

National Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3