A Novel Content and Usability Analysis of UK Professional Regulator Information About Raising a Concern by Members of the Public

Author:

Ryan‐Blackwell Gemma1ORCID,Wallace Louise M.1ORCID,Ribenfors Francesca2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Well‐being, Education & Language Studies The Open University Milton Keynes UK

2. Department of Social Care & Social Work, Faculty of Health and Education Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundHealth and social care regulators ensure that professionals have the correct qualifications and experience to practice in their profession. Globally, there are over 130 regulators of nursing alone and 13 health and social care statutory regulators in the United Kingdom. The public are the largest source of concerns to regulators about the registrants' fitness to practise (FtP).AimThis study aimed to examine the amount, type and content of the information available from UK regulators and evaluate the usability of the process for members of the public considering raising a concern with a regulator about a registrant's fitness to practise (FtP) and the experience of those who had recently raised a concern.MethodsThe websites of the UK's 13 statutory health and social care regulators were searched between November 2021 and February 2022 for information about the process of raising a concern. Webpages and public‐facing documentation were downloaded, and qualitative content analysis was conducted. The usability of regulator websites and the concerns referral form were assessed by 11 people using an adapted ‘system usability scale’. Seven interviews, a focus group (n = 5) and a survey (n = 62) of people who had raised a concern were used to explore their experiences to validate our findings and recommendations.ResultsThemes were identified related to format and layout, the process and support to raise a concern, with wide variation found between regulators. Focus groups, interviews and surveys validated these findings.Discussion and ConclusionInformation and the ease of finding this information are fundamental in promoting public confidence and trust in regulator purpose and process. When raising a concern, it is important that information is honest, clear and accurate and available in a range of different formats so that it suits the diverse needs of members of the public. Improvements in these processes could support regulators to better achieve their primary purpose of protecting the public.Public ContributionThe public were consulted on our findings using two focus groups, seven interviews and 62 survey respondents.Our project advisory group of people with lived experience of involvement in FtP discussed the findings and contributed to the recommendations.Trial RegistrationN/A.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference46 articles.

1. “Fitness to Practise ”General Dental Council 2024 https://www.gdc-uk.org/about-us/what-we-do/fitness-to-practise.

2. “What Is Fitness to Practise? ”Professional Standards Authority 2023 https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/news-and-blog/blog/detail/blog/2022/07/14/what-is-fitness-to-practise.

3. “Who We Are ”International Council of Nurses 2023 https://www.icn.ch/who-we-are.

4. “Membership Listing ”International Association of Medical Regulatory authorities 2023 accessed February 9 2024 https://www.iamra.com/membership-listing.

5. General Medical Council Exploring the Experience of Public and Patient Complainants Who Have Been through the GMC's Fitness to Practise Procedures(London UK: General Medical Council 2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3