A new network analysis model in anorexia nervosa patients based on self‐reported eating disorder symptoms, psychological distress, and cognitive flexibility

Author:

Giles Sarah1,Hughes Elizabeth K.123,Castle David4,Jenkins Zoe567,Phillipou Andrea58910,Rossell Susan511,Urbini Gemma12,Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz Matthew1314,Krug Isabel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Department of Paediatrics The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Centre for Mental Health Service Innovation University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

5. Department of Mental Health St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

6. Iverson Institute Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Department of Psychiatry The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

8. Orygen Melbourne Victoria Australia

9. Centre for Youth Mental Health The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. Department of Psychological Sciences Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia

11. Centre for Mental Health Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia

12. Body Image & Eating Disorders Treatment & Recovery Service St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

13. School of Psychology Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

14. Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development Deakin University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesCognitive flexibility and psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety, have been implicated in the aetiology of Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Despite the known associations between eating disorder (ED) symptoms, depression, anxiety, and cognitive flexibility, the specific pathways that connect these constructs are unclear. We therefore used network analysis to examine the relationship between these symptoms in an AN sample.MethodsOne hundred and ninety‐three treatment‐seeking individuals diagnosed with AN (95.6% female, M = 26.89 [SD = 9.45] years old) completed self‐report measures assessing depression, anxiety, cognitive flexibility, and ED symptoms. To determine each symptom's influence in the network, we calculated the expected influence.ResultsThe two relationships with the greatest edges were those between (1) weight/shape concerns and eating/dietary restraint and (2) weight/shape concerns and psychological distress (a measure that combined depression and anxiety). Cognitive flexibility was not connected to weight/shape concerns but had negative partial associations with eating concerns/dietary restraint and psychological distress. There was also a slight, non‐zero connection between eating concerns/dietary restraint and psychological distress.ConclusionsThe findings underscore the importance of weight/shape, eating/dietary concerns, and psychological distress in the AN network and suggest that addressing cognitive flexibility may be a useful target for eating concerns/dietary restraint and psychological distress. Future studies assessing the longitudinal course of psychopathology within the AN network structure may help in identifying whether specific symptoms function as risk factors or maintaining factors for this co‐occurrence.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3