Recommendations for outcome measurement for deprescribing intervention studies

Author:

Bayliss Elizabeth A.12,Albers Kathleen1,Gleason Kathy1,Pieper Lisa E.1,Boyd Cynthia M.3,Campbell Noll L.45,Ensrud Kristine E.67ORCID,Gray Shelly L.8,Linsky Amy M.910,Mangin Derelie1112,Min Lillian1314ORCID,Rich Michael W.15,Steinman Michael A.1617ORCID,Turner Justin18,Vasilevskis Eduard E.1920,Dublin Sascha2122

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Colorado Aurora Colorado USA

2. Department of Family Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

3. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

4. Department of Pharmacy Practice Purdue University College of Pharmacy West Lafayette Indiana USA

5. Center for Aging Research Regenstrief Institute, Inc Indianapolis Indiana USA

6. Department of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology and Community Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

7. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research Veterans Affairs Health Care System Minneapolis Minnesota USA

8. School of Pharmacy University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

9. Section of General Internal Medicine and Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

10. Section of General Internal Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

11. Department of Family Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

12. Department of General Practice University of Otago Christchurch New Zealand

13. Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

14. Ann Arbor VA Medical Center Geriatric Education Research and Clinical Center Ann Arbor Michigan USA

15. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA

16. Division of Geriatrics University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA

17. Division of Geriatraics San Francisco VA Medical Center San Francisco California USA

18. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

19. Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

20. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Tennessee USA

21. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Kaiser Permanente Washington Seattle Washington USA

22. Epidemiology Department University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractInterpreting results from deprescribing interventions to generate actionable evidence is challenging owing to inconsistent and heterogeneous outcome definitions between studies. We sought to characterize deprescribing intervention outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. A scoping literature review focused on deprescribing interventions for polypharmacy and informed a series of expert panel discussions and recommendations. Twelve experts in deprescribing research, policy, and clinical practice interventions participating in the Measures Workgroup of the US Deprescribing Research Network sought to characterize deprescribing outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. The scoping review identified 125 papers reflecting 107 deprescribing studies. Common outcomes included medication discontinuation, medication appropriateness, and a broad range of clinical outcomes potentially resulting from medication reduction. Panel recommendations included clearly defining clinically meaningful medication outcomes (e.g., number of chronic medications, dose reductions), ensuring adequate sample size and follow‐up time to capture clinical outcomes resulting from medication discontinuation (e.g., quality of life [QOL]), and selecting appropriate and feasible data sources. A new conceptual model illustrates how downstream clinical outcomes (e.g., reduction in falls) should be interpreted in the context of initial changes in medication measures (e.g., reduction in mean total medications). Areas needing further development include implementation outcomes specific to deprescribing interventions and measures of adverse drug withdrawal events. Generating evidence to guide deprescribing is essential to address patient, caregiver, and clinician concerns about the benefits and harms of medication discontinuation. This article provides recommendations and an initial conceptual framework for selecting and applying appropriate intervention outcomes to support deprescribing research.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3