Acute care nurses' decisions to recognise and respond to patient improvement: A qualitative study

Author:

Burdeu Gabrielle12ORCID,Rasmussen Bodil1234ORCID,Lowe Grainne5,Considine Julie126ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Deakin University Geelong Australia

2. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Geelong Australia

3. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Faculty of Health Sciences University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

5. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Berwick Australia

6. Eastern Health Box Hill Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore and describe acute care nurses’ decisions to recognise and respond to improvement in patients’ clinical states as they occurred in the real‐world clinical environment.DesignA descriptive study.MethodsNine medical and eleven surgical nurses in a large Australian metropolitan hospital were individually observed during nurse–patient interactions and followed up in interview to describe their reasoning and clinical judgements behind observed decisions. Verbal description of observations and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.ResultsThe three themes constructed from the data were as follows: nurses checking in; nurses reaching judgements about improvements; and nurses deciding on the best person to respond. Acute care nurses made targeted assessment decisions based on predicted safety risks related to improvement in clinical states. Subjective and objective cues were used to assess for and make judgements about patient improvement. Acute care nurses’ judgment of patient safety and a desire to promote patient centred care guided their decisions to select the appropriate person to manage improvement.ConclusionsThe outcomes of this research have demonstrated that the proven safety benefits of acute care nurses’ decision making in response to deterioration extend to improvement in patients’ clinical states. In response to improvement, acute care nurses’ decisions protect patients from harm and promote recovery.Implications for patient careEarly recognition and response to improvement enable acute care nurses to protect patients from risks of unnecessary treatment and promote recovery.ImpactThis study makes explicit nurses’ essential safety role in recognising and responding to improvement in patients’ clinical states. Healthcare policy and education must reflect the equal importance of assessment for and management of deterioration and improvement to ensure patients are protected and provided with safe care.

Funder

Deakin University

Publisher

Wiley

Reference34 articles.

1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (n.d.).Partnering with consumers standard.https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs‐standards/partnering‐consumers‐standard

2. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of idle intravenous catheters: An integrative review

3. FROM NOVICE TO EXPERT

4. The pre‐Medical Emergency Team response: Nurses' decision‐making escalating deterioration to treating teams using urgent review criteria

5. Introduction to interview research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3