Frontloading visual field tests detect earlier mean deviation progression when applied to real‐world‐derived early‐stage glaucoma data

Author:

Wang Henrietta123ORCID,Kalloniatis Michael13ORCID,Tan Jeremy C.K.45ORCID,Phu Jack12367ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Optometry and Vision Science University of New South Wales Kensington New South Wales Australia

2. Centre for Eye Health University of New South Wales Kensington New South Wales Australia

3. School of Medicine (Optometry) Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia

4. Faculty of Medicine and Health University of New South Wales Kensington New South Wales Australia

5. Department of Ophthalmology Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia

6. Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Camperdown New South Wales Australia

7. Concord Clinical School Concord Repatriation General Hospital Concord New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo examine the diagnostic accuracy of performing two (frontloaded) versus one (clinical standard) visual field (VF) test per visit for detecting the progression of early glaucoma in data derived from clinical populations.MethodsA computer simulation model was used to follow the VFs of 10,000 glaucoma patients (derived from two cohorts: Heijl et al., Swedish cohort; and Chauhan et al., Canadian Glaucoma Study [CGS]) over a 10‐year period to identify patients whose mean deviation (MD) progression was detected. Core data (baseline MD and progression rates) were extracted from two studies in clinical cohorts of glaucoma, which were modulated using SITA‐Faster variability characteristics from previous work. Additional variables included follow‐up intervals (six‐monthly or yearly) and rates of perimetric data loss for any reason (0%, 15% and 30%). The main outcome measures were the proportions of progressors detected.ResultsWhen the Swedish cohort was reviewed six‐monthly, the frontloaded strategy detected more progressors compared to the non‐frontloaded method up to years 8, 9 and 10 of follow‐up for 0%, 15% and 30% data loss conditions. The time required to detect 50% of cases was 1.0–1.5 years less for frontloading compared to non‐frontloading. At 4 years, frontloading increased detection by 26.7%, 28.7% and 32.4% for 0%, 15% and 30% data loss conditions, respectively. Where both techniques detected progression, frontloading detected progressors earlier compared to the non‐frontloaded strategy (78.5%–81.5% and by 1.0–1.3 years when reviewed six‐monthly; 81%–82.9% and by 1.2–2.1 years when reviewed yearly). Accordingly, these patients had less severe MD scores (six‐monthly review: 0.63–1.67 dB ‘saved’; yearly review: 1.10–2.87 dB). The differences increased with higher rates of data loss. Similar tendencies were noted when applied to the CGS cohort.ConclusionsFrontloaded VFs applied to clinical distributions of MD and progression led to earlier detection of early glaucoma progression.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3