Effectiveness of surgical interventions for managing obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis framed using minimal important difference estimates based on GRADE guidance to inform a clinical practice guideline

Author:

Oei Krista12,Johnston Bradley C.3,Ball Geoff D. C.4ORCID,Fitzpatrick‐Lewis Donna5,Usman Ali5,Sherifali Diana5,Esmaeilinezhad Zahra3,Merdad Roah6,Dettmer Elizabeth1,Erdstein Julius7,Langer Jacob C.12,Birken Catherine12,Henderson Mélanie89,Moore Sarah A.10,Morrison Katherine M.511,Hamilton Jill12ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

2. University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

4. University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

5. McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

6. King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia

7. Montreal Children's Hospital Montreal Québec Canada

8. CHU Sainte‐Justine Montreal Québec Canada

9. University of Montreal Montreal Québec Canada

10. Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

11. McMaster Children's Hospital Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

SummaryObjectiveTo summarize the literature on bariatric surgery for managing pediatric obesity, including intervention effects to improve patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometry, and assess adverse events (AEs).MethodsEligible studies were published between January 2012 and January 2022 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational (controlled and uncontrolled) studies before and after surgery with a mean age <18 years old. Outcomes and subgroups were selected a priori by stakeholders; estimates of effect for outcomes were presented relative to minimal important differences (MIDs) and GRADE certainty of evidence. We examined data on PROMs, cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometry, and AEs. Subgroup analyses examined outcomes by follow‐up duration and surgical technique, when possible.ResultsOverall, 63 publications (43 original studies) met our inclusion criteria (n = 6128 participants; 66% female). Studies reported six different surgical techniques that were evaluated using uncontrolled single arm observational (n = 49), controlled observational (n = 13), and RCT (n = 1) designs. Most studies included short‐term follow‐up (<18 months) only. PROMs were measured in 12 (28%) studies. Surgery led to large improvements in health‐related quality of life compared to baseline and control groups, and moderate to very large improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors compared to baseline. Large to very large improvements in BMIz were noted compared to baseline across all follow‐up periods. There was limited evidence of AEs with most reporting mild or non‐specific AEs; serious AEs were uncommon.ConclusionBariatric surgery demonstrated primarily moderate to very large improvements across diverse outcomes with limited evidence of AEs, albeit with low to moderate certainty of evidence.

Funder

Obesity Canada

Alberta Health Services

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3