Carbon uptake in Eurasian boreal forests dominates the high‐latitude net ecosystem carbon budget

Author:

Watts Jennifer D.1ORCID,Farina Mary12,Kimball John S.3,Schiferl Luke D.45ORCID,Liu Zhihua3,Arndt Kyle A.16,Zona Donatella7,Ballantyne Ashley8,Euskirchen Eugénie S.9,Parmentier Frans‐Jan W.1011,Helbig Manuel12,Sonnentag Oliver13,Tagesson Torbern11ORCID,Rinne Janne1114,Ikawa Hiroki15,Ueyama Masahito16,Kobayashi Hideki17,Sachs Torsten18,Nadeau Daniel F.19,Kochendorfer John20,Jackowicz‐Korczynski Marcin1121,Virkkala Anna1,Aurela Mika22,Commane Roisin4,Byrne Brendan23,Birch Leah1,Johnson Matthew S.24,Madani Nima23,Rogers Brendan1,Du Jinyang3,Endsley Arthur3,Savage Kathleen1,Poulter Ben25,Zhang Zhen26,Bruhwiler Lori M.27,Miller Charles E.23,Goetz Scott28,Oechel Walter C.7

Affiliation:

1. Woodwell Climate Research Center Falmouth Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Montana State University Bozeman Montana USA

3. Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), ISB 415 University of Montana Missoula Montana USA

4. Lamont‐Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University Palisades New York USA

5. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

6. Earth Systems Research Center University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA

7. Global Change Research Group Department of Biology, Physical Sciences 240 San Diego State University San Diego California USA

8. Global Climate and Ecology Laboratory, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation University of Montana Missoula Montana USA

9. Institute of Arctic Biology Fairbanks Alaska USA

10. Department of Geosciences, Center for Biogeochemistry in the Anthropocene University of Oslo Oslo Norway

11. Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science Lund University Lund Sweden

12. Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

13. University of Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada

14. Natural Resources Institute Finland Helsinki Finland

15. Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO Sapporo Japan

16. Osaka Metropolitan University Sakai Japan

17. JAMSTEC‐Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology Yokohama Japan

18. GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience Potsdam Germany

19. Department of Civil and Water Engineering Université Laval Quebec City Quebec Canada

20. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Atmospheric and Turbulent Diffusion Division Oak Ridge Tennessee USA

21. Department of Ecoscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark

22. Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki Finland

23. Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena California USA

24. Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field California USA

25. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt Maryland USA

26. Department of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA

27. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division Boulder Colorado USA

28. School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA

Abstract

AbstractArctic‐boreal landscapes are experiencing profound warming, along with changes in ecosystem moisture status and disturbance from fire. This region is of global importance in terms of carbon feedbacks to climate, yet the sign (sink or source) and magnitude of the Arctic‐boreal carbon budget within recent years remains highly uncertain. Here, we provide new estimates of recent (2003–2015) vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco), net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE; Reco − GPP), and terrestrial methane (CH4) emissions for the Arctic‐boreal zone using a satellite data‐driven process‐model for northern ecosystems (TCFM‐Arctic), calibrated and evaluated using measurements from >60 tower eddy covariance (EC) sites. We used TCFM‐Arctic to obtain daily 1‐km2 flux estimates and annual carbon budgets for the pan‐Arctic‐boreal region. Across the domain, the model indicated an overall average NEE sink of −850 Tg CO2‐C year−1. Eurasian boreal zones, especially those in Siberia, contributed to a majority of the net sink. In contrast, the tundra biome was relatively carbon neutral (ranging from small sink to source). Regional CH4 emissions from tundra and boreal wetlands (not accounting for aquatic CH4) were estimated at 35 Tg CH4‐C year−1. Accounting for additional emissions from open water aquatic bodies and from fire, using available estimates from the literature, reduced the total regional NEE sink by 21% and shifted many far northern tundra landscapes, and some boreal forests, to a net carbon source. This assessment, based on in situ observations and models, improves our understanding of the high‐latitude carbon status and also indicates a continued need for integrated site‐to‐regional assessments to monitor the vulnerability of these ecosystems to climate change.

Funder

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

National Science Foundation

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3