Effectiveness of SCAR‐Q for assessment of incisional SCAR after implant‐based reconstruction in breast cancer patients: Can it be a tool for incision selection?

Author:

Suzuki Misa1,Komiya Takako1,Asai Maiko1,Ayabe Nanako1,Hanano Mai1,Kawai Yuichiro1,Shimada Kazuki1,Ishikawa Takashi2,Matsumura Hajime1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Breast Oncology and Surgery Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractIncisional scarring is a factor of cosmetic appearance evaluated after breast reconstruction, along with the shape, position, and size of the breast. This study aimed to examine the effect of the incision scar location on patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Using the Japanese version of the SCAR‐Q, we assessed the scar appearance, symptoms and psychosocial effects. Plastic surgeons performed assessments using the Manchester Scar Scale. The patients were divided into two groups: those with scars on the margins of the breast (MB group) and those with scars in the breast area (IB group). The results revealed that patients in the MB group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the scar appearance and psychological impact than those in the IB group. However, assessments using the Manchester Scar Scale did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of patient‐reported outcomes in the evaluation of scar satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Patients tend to prefer and have higher satisfaction with scars along the breast margin, which offers valuable insights into surgical decisions. Further studies with larger and more diverse sample sizes are required for validation.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference14 articles.

1. Predictors of satisfaction and quality of life following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction

2. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices;Fearmonti F;Eplasty,2010

3. Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars

4. SCAR‐Q© Scales.Accessed December 02 2023.https://qportfolio.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/SCAR-Q-Translations.pdf

5. A New Quantitative Scale for Clinical Scar Assessment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3