Vonoprazan‐based therapies versus PPI‐based therapies in patients with H. pylori infection: Systematic review and meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Liu Ligang1ORCID,Shi Hekai2,Shi Yufei3,Wang Anlin4,Guo Nuojin5,Li Fang6,Nahata Milap C.17

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Therapeutic Innovations and Outcomes (ITIO), College of Pharmacy The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

2. Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital Shanghai China

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy Fudan University Shanghai China

4. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao‐Yang Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

5. Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai East Hospital Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai China

6. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing You An Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China

7. College of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan‐amoxicillin (VA), vonoprazan‐amoxicillin‐clarithromycin (VAC), vonoprazan‐based bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy (VBQT), and PPI‐based triple (PAC) or quadruple therapy (PBQT) for H. pylori infection with the consideration of duration of therapy and amoxicillin dose (H: high; L: low).Materials and MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 15, 2023. The efficacy outcome was eradication rate, and safety outcomes included the rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation.ResultsTwenty‐seven RCTs were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.8% for VA, 89.1% for VAC, and 91.8% for VBQT, which increased with the higher amoxicillin frequency of administration and extended duration of therapy within each regimen. There were no significant differences in eradication rate when comparing 7‐VA versus 7‐VAC and 14‐VA versus 14‐VAC. VA was at least comparable to PAC. The eradication rate did not differ significantly between 10‐H‐VA or 14‐H‐VA versus 14‐PBQT. 7‐L‐VAC demonstrated higher eradication rate versus 7‐PAC and comparable rate to 14‐PAC. 14‐VBQT showed higher eradication rates versus 14‐PBQT. The adverse events rate was 19.3% for VA, 30.6% for VAC, and 38.4% for VBQT. VA had similar risk of adverse events versus VAC and significantly fewer adverse events compared to PBQT. The treatment discontinuation rate did not differ significantly between treatments.ConclusionsThe eradication rate of VBQT was the highest at above 90% followed by VAC and VA. VA was as effective as VAC and superior to PPI‐based therapies with favorable safety, highlighting the potential of VA therapy as a promising alternative to traditional PPI‐based therapies. VPZ‐based triple or quadruple therapies was more effective than PPI‐based therapies. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen especially in the western countries.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3