Evaluating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence‐based tools in detecting and understanding sleep health misinformation: Comparative analysis using Google Bard and OpenAI ChatGPT‐4

Author:

Garbarino Sergio12ORCID,Bragazzi Nicola Luigi134ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal, Child Sciences (DINOGMI) University of Genoa Genoa Italy

2. Post‐Graduate School of Occupational Health Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy

3. Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics York University Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Human Nutrition Unit (HNU), Department of Food and Drugs University of Parma Parma Italy

Abstract

SummaryThis study evaluates the performance of two major artificial intelligence‐based tools (ChatGPT‐4 and Google Bard) in debunking sleep‐related myths. More in detail, the present research assessed 20 sleep misconceptions using a 5‐point Likert scale for falseness and public health significance, comparing responses of artificial intelligence tools with expert opinions. The results indicated that Google Bard correctly identified 19 out of 20 statements as false (95.0% accuracy), not differing from ChatGPT‐4 (85.0% accuracy, Fisher's exact test p = 0.615). Google Bard's ratings of the falseness of the sleep misconceptions averaged 4.25 ± 0.70, showing a moderately negative skewness (−0.42) and kurtosis (−0.83), and suggesting a distribution with fewer extreme values compared with ChatGPT‐4. In assessing public health significance, Google Bard's mean score was 2.4 ± 0.80, with skewness and kurtosis of 0.36 and −0.07, respectively, indicating a more normal distribution compared with ChatGPT‐4. The inter‐rater agreement between Google Bard and sleep experts had an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.58 for falseness and 0.69 for public health significance, showing moderate alignment (p = 0.065 and p = 0.014, respectively). Text‐mining analysis revealed Google Bard's focus on practical advice, while ChatGPT‐4 concentrated on theoretical aspects of sleep. The readability analysis suggested Google Bard's responses were more accessible, aligning with 8th‐grade level material, versus ChatGPT‐4's 12th‐grade level complexity. The study demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence in public health education, especially in sleep health, and underscores the importance of accurate, reliable artificial intelligence‐generated information, calling for further collaboration between artificial intelligence developers, sleep health professionals and educators to enhance the effectiveness of sleep health promotion.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3