A single‐centre prospective study comparing efficacy and safety of apremilast with cyclosporine in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundApremilast regulates several pro‐inflammatory signals involved in atopic dermatitis (AD).MethodsA randomized, open‐labelled study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in India. Fifty patients with AD of >1 year duration were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either apremilast (30 mg twice daily after initial titration) or cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) for 24 weeks, followed by a 12‐week follow‐up period. Primary outcome was mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of patients achieving EASI 75, EASI 90, ≥2‐point improvement in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 at week 24 and percentage of patients experiencing ≥1 adverse effect (AEs).ResultsMean percentage change in EASI (standard deviation) was −67.79% [22.44] in the apremilast treatment group and −83.06% [21.20] in the cyclosporine treatment group (p < 0.05). At week 24, 52.38% of patients in the apremilast group and 78.26% in the cyclosporine group achieved EASI 75 (p < 0.05); 14.29% in the apremilast group and 52.17% in the cyclosporine group achieved EASI 90 (p < 0.05) and 80.95% in the apremilast group and 82.60% patients achieved ≥2 point reduction in IGA (p > 0.05). 57.14% of patients achieved SCORAD 75 in the apremilast group and 69.56% in the cyclosporine group (p > 0.05). Mean time taken to achieve EASI 75 in the apremilast group was 4.50 ± 4.62 weeks, while it was 3.96 ± 3.43 weeks in the cyclosporine group (p > 0.05). Incidence of AEs was 28.57% in the apremilast group and 21.74%) in the cyclosporine group.ConclusionsApremilast demonstrated lesser efficacy in comparison to cyclosporine; it has the advantage of a favourable safety profile and requires no laboratory monitoring.