Nordic nurses' areas of research during and related to the COVID‐19 pandemic. A scoping review with recommendations for evidence‐based practice

Author:

Loft Mia Ingerslev123ORCID,Berthelsen Connie45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Institute for People and Technology, Roskilde University Roskilde Denmark

3. Department of Public Health, Section of Nursing Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

4. Medical department Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark

5. Institute of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe knowledge of the landscape of COVID‐19 research performed by nurses in hospitals and health services is scarce. It is important to identify, map and share knowledge and thus provide a better understanding of the important research performed by nurses.AimsTo provide a comprehensive overview of Nordic nurses' focus areas of research during and related to the COVID‐19 pandemic and to extract knowledge on recommendations for future evidence‐based practice.MethodsThe electronic databases of MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and Scopus (via Elsevier) were searched for studies describing all areas of nursing during and related to the COVID‐19 pandemic conducted in the Nordic countries. Studies conducted by a nurse as the first or last author and published from March 2020 to March 2022 were included in the scoping review. The protocol for the review is registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/f8kuq).ResultsOf 8412 studies found in the comprehensive search, 119 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were written by nurses from Denmark (42%), Sweden (31%), Norway (20%), Finland (6%) and Iceland (1%). The majority of studies (39%) covered patients' and relatives' experiences of visiting restrictions and social distancing and relatives' communications with healthcare professionals. Twenty‐six per cent of included studies covered healthcare professionals' experiences of caring for patients infected with COVID‐19, working during the pandemic and suffering from the consequences of both.Linking Evidence to ActionThe recommendations of evidence‐based practice for future pandemics show that social distancing for disease prevention must be provided while considering the human consequences of social distancing. Special training is also recommended for healthcare professionals caring for COVID‐19 patients accompanied by psychosocial support for their mental well‐being. Additionally, virtual contact is an important supplement to personal treatment and face‐to‐face contact during social restrictions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3