Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma showed better prognosis than those with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction

Abstract

ObjectivesWe followed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) grouping criteria and conducted a clinicopathological cohort study in a unique patient population to gain insight into the pathobiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AGEJ).MethodsWe studied and statistically compared the clinicopathological and prognostic features of both cancers in 303 consecutive patients treated at the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System over a 20‐year period using uniform criteria and standardized routines.ResultsOver 99% of patients were white men with a mean age of 69.1 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 28.0 kg/m2. No significant differences were detected in age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, and history of tobacco abuse between the two groups. Compared to AGEJ patients, a significantly higher proportion of EAC patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease, long‐segment Barrett's esophagus, common adenocarcinoma type, smaller tumor size, better differentiation, more stages I or II but fewer stages III or IV diseases, scarcer lymph node invasion, fewer distant metastases, and better overall, disease‐free, and relapse‐free survival. The 5‐year overall survival rate was significantly higher in EAC patients than in AGEJ patients (41.3% vs 17.2%, P < 0.001). This improved survival among EAC patients remained significant after censoring all cases detected during endoscopic surveillance, suggesting different pathogenesis mechanisms between EAC and AGEJ.ConclusionsEAC patients showed significantly better outcomes than AGEJ patients. Our results require validation in other patient populations.