Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial

Author:

Liu Bing Rong12ORCID,Kong Ling Jian1,Ullah Saif1ORCID,Xiao Ma3,Sun Xiang Zhao4,Zhang Ji Yu1,Zheng Dong Lin5,Zhao Li Xia1,Nong Cheng Shen5,Qu Bo3,Zhao Lei3,Liu Dan1,Li De Liang1,Song Ji Tao3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan Province China

2. State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan Province China

3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin Heilongjiang Province China

4. The Lianjiang People's Hospital Lianjiang Guangdong Province China

5. Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine Nanning Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region China

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) with appendectomy for treating acute uncomplicated appendicitis.MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter randomized trial in which consecutive patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either ERAT or appendectomy. The outcomes included technical success rate, procedure time, postoperative pain relief, postoperative analgesic use, time to soft diet intake, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrence rate.ResultsFrom August 2013 to December 2015, 110 patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis were randomized to ERAT or appendectomy. The technical success rate was 94.55% for ERAT compared with 100% for appendectomy. Recurrence of appendicitis within 3‐year follow‐up occurred in 8 patients following ERAT. Postoperative abdominal pain was less frequent with ERAT than with appendectomy (21.15% [11/52] vs 87.27% [48/55], P < 0.001). Soft diet intake begun earlier after ERAT than appendectomy (6 h vs 48 h, P < 0.001), and post‐procedure hospital stay was shorter (3 days vs 5 days, P < 0.001), as was the use of analgesics postoperatively (9.09% vs 49.09%, P < 0.001).ConclusionsERAT is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative approach for the management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Compared with appendectomy, advantages of ERAT include no skin wound, organ preservation, reduced postoperative pain, early food intake, quick recovery, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter post‐procedure hospitalization. The unsolved problem related to ERAT is the recurrence of appendicitis.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3