Planning and licensing for marine aquaculture

Author:

Falconer Lynne1ORCID,Cutajar Karl1,Krupandan Amalia1,Capuzzo Elisa2,Corner Richard A.3,Ellis Tim2,Jeffery Keith2,Mikkelsen Eirik4ORCID,Moore Heather5,O'Beirn Francis X.6,O'Donohoe Pauline6,Ruane Neil M.6,Shilland Robyn7,Tett Paul8,Telfer Trevor C.1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK

2. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK

3. School of Ocean Science, Bangor University Wales UK

4. Nofima Tromsø Norway

5. Agri‐Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK

6. Marine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland

7. The Association for Coastal Ecosystem Services Lochend Cottage Dunbar UK

8. Scottish Association for Marine Science Oban UK

Abstract

AbstractMarine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services, but appropriate planning, licensing and regulation systems must be in place to enable sustainable development. At present, approaches vary considerably throughout the world, and several national and regional investigations have highlighted the need for reforms if marine aquaculture is to fulfil its potential. This article aims to map and evaluate the challenges of planning and licensing for growth of sustainable marine aquaculture. Despite the range of species, production systems and circumstances, this study found a number of common themes in the literature; complicated and fragmented approaches to planning and licensing, property rights and the licence to operate, competition for space and marine spatial planning, emerging species and diversifying marine aquaculture production (seaweed production, Integrated Multi‐Trophic Aquaculture [IMTA], nutrient and carbon offsetting with aquaculture, offshore aquaculture and co‐location and multiuse platforms), and the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision‐support tools. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so the UK is used as a case study to show more detailed examples that highlight the range of challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. There are many complexities, but this study shows that many countries have undergone, or are undergoing, similar challenges, suggesting that lessons can be learned by sharing knowledge and experiences, even across different species and production systems, rather than having a more insular focus.

Funder

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

European Commission

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Natural Environment Research Council

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology,Aquatic Science

Reference301 articles.

1. RossLG TelferTC FalconerL SotoD Aguilar‐ManjarrezJ.Site selection and carrying capacities for inland and coastal aquaculture.FAO/Institute of Aquaculture University of Stirling Expert Workshop 6–8 December 2010 Stirling the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 21. FAO;2013.

2. Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: A cross-country analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3