Affiliation:
1. Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK
2. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK
3. School of Ocean Science, Bangor University Wales UK
4. Nofima Tromsø Norway
5. Agri‐Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK
6. Marine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland
7. The Association for Coastal Ecosystem Services Lochend Cottage Dunbar UK
8. Scottish Association for Marine Science Oban UK
Abstract
AbstractMarine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services, but appropriate planning, licensing and regulation systems must be in place to enable sustainable development. At present, approaches vary considerably throughout the world, and several national and regional investigations have highlighted the need for reforms if marine aquaculture is to fulfil its potential. This article aims to map and evaluate the challenges of planning and licensing for growth of sustainable marine aquaculture. Despite the range of species, production systems and circumstances, this study found a number of common themes in the literature; complicated and fragmented approaches to planning and licensing, property rights and the licence to operate, competition for space and marine spatial planning, emerging species and diversifying marine aquaculture production (seaweed production, Integrated Multi‐Trophic Aquaculture [IMTA], nutrient and carbon offsetting with aquaculture, offshore aquaculture and co‐location and multiuse platforms), and the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision‐support tools. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so the UK is used as a case study to show more detailed examples that highlight the range of challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. There are many complexities, but this study shows that many countries have undergone, or are undergoing, similar challenges, suggesting that lessons can be learned by sharing knowledge and experiences, even across different species and production systems, rather than having a more insular focus.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
European Commission
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Natural Environment Research Council
Norges Forskningsråd
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology,Aquatic Science
Reference301 articles.
1. RossLG TelferTC FalconerL SotoD Aguilar‐ManjarrezJ.Site selection and carrying capacities for inland and coastal aquaculture.FAO/Institute of Aquaculture University of Stirling Expert Workshop 6–8 December 2010 Stirling the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 21. FAO;2013.
2. Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: A cross-country analysis