Affiliation:
1. Imperial College School of Medicine London UK
2. Department of Anaesthesia Great Ormond Street Hospital London UK
3. Division of Anaesthesia, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK
4. Directorate of Critical Care Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
5. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust London UK
6. The Pain Research Group Imperial College London London UK
Abstract
SummaryDespite the existence of evidence‐based guidelines for the assessment and management of pain in the critical care setting, the prevalence of acute pain remains high. Inadequate pain management is associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced capacity for rehabilitation and long‐term psychological sequelae. This study aimed to describe the experiences of pain management from healthcare professionals working in intensive care units. Healthcare professionals were recruited from intensive care units in London, UK using a purposive sampling technique. Semi‐structured interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis technique. Thirty participants were recruited from eight diverse intensive care units. Five themes were identified. First, there was a lack of consensus in pain assessment in the ICU where nursing staff described more knowledge and confidence of validated pain measures than physicians, and concerns over validity and usability were raised. Second, there was a universal perception of resource availability impacting the quality of pain management including high clinical workload, staff turnover and availability of certain pain management techniques. Third, acknowledgement of the importance of pain management was highest in those with experience of interacting with critical care survivors. Fourth, participants described their own emotional reaction to managing those in pain which influenced their learning. Finally, there was a perception that, due to the complexity of the intensive care unit population, pain was de‐prioritised and there were conflicting views as to whether standardised analgosedation algorithms were useful. This study provides evidence to suggest interdisciplinary training, collaboratively designed decision‐making tools, prioritisation initiatives and research priorities are areas that could be targeted to improve pain management in critical care.
Funder
Association of Anaesthetists
National Institute for Health and Care Research
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献