Comparison of five retinoids for anti‐photoaging therapy: Evaluation of anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative activities in vitro and therapeutic efficacy in vivo

Abstract

AbstractOver the past decades, increasing evidences have demonstrated that five retinoids, including retinol (ROL), retinol acetate (RAc), retinol propionate (RP), retinol palmitate (RPalm), and hydroxypinacolone retinoate (HPR), can be potential therapeutic agents for skin photoaging. However, therapeutic efficacies and biosafety have never been compared to these compounds. This study aimed to determine the optimal retinoid type(s) for anti‐photoaging therapy both in vitro and in vivo. Our data demonstrated that four retinoids (RPalm, RP, HPR and ROL) but not RAc were effective for anti‐photoaging treatment at 5 μg/mL in vitro, with action mechanisms associated with antioxidative, anti‐inflammatory and anti‐skin ECM degradation activities. Notably, both RPalm and RP appeared superior to HPR and ROL for those activities. Importantly, both RPalm and RP were shown to be optimal for anti‐photoaging therapy when topically applied at 5 mg/kg in a UVB‐induced mice model of photoaging, which is consistent with their high anti‐photoaging activities in vitro. Additionally, topical application of these five retinoids showed satisfactory biosafety without causing significant apoptosis in animal organs, although RP application led to a slight decline in animal body weights. Collectively, these data have laid a good foundation for the next development of the clinical application of these retinoids for skin healthcare.