Evaluation of a diagnostic platelet aggregation test strategy for platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionLight transmission aggregometry (LTA) is important for diagnosing platelet function disorders (PFD) and von Willebrand disease (VWD) affecting ristocetin‐induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). Nonetheless, data is lacking on the utility of LTA for investigating thrombocytopenic patients and platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts (L‐PRP). Previously, we developed a strategy for diagnostic LTA assessment of L‐PRP that included: (1) acceptance of referrals/samples, regardless of thrombocytopenia severity, (2) tailored agonist selection, based on which are informative for L‐PRP with mildly or severely low platelet counts, and (3) interpretation of maximal aggregation (MA) using regression‐derived 95% confidence intervals, determined for diluted control L‐PRP (C‐L‐PRP).MethodsTo further evaluate the L‐PRP LTA strategy, we evaluated findings for a subsequent patient cohort.ResultsBetween 2008 and 2021, the L‐PRP strategy was applied to 211 samples (11.7% of all LTA samples) from 192 unique patients, whose platelet counts (median [range] × 109/L) for blood and L‐PRP were: 105 [13–282; 89% with thrombocytopenia] and 164 [17–249], respectively. Patient‐L‐PRP had more abnormal MA findings than simultaneously tested C‐L‐PRP (p‐values <0.001). Among patients with accessible electronic medical records (n = 181), L‐PRP LTA uncovered significant aggregation abnormalities in 45 (24.9%), including 18/30 (60%) with <80 × 109 platelets/L L‐PRP, and ruled out PFD, and VWD affecting RIPA, in others. The L‐PRP LTA strategy helped diagnose VWD affecting RIPA, Bernard Soulier syndrome, familial platelet disorder with myeloid malignancy, suspected ITGA2B/ITGB3‐related thrombocytopenia, and acquired PFD.ConclusionDiagnostic LTA with L‐PRP, using a strategy that considers thrombocytopenia severity, is feasible and informative.