Abstract
AbstractA 42‐year‐old Vietnamese egg factory worker in Ishikawa prefecture, Japan, presented with itchy concentric erythema on the trunk and left calf. The lesions tested positive by direct potassium hydroxide examination, and two fungal strains were isolated. The isolates produced conidia abundantly and were morphologically indistinguishable from Trichophyton mentagrophytes/interdigitale, but were identified as Trichophyton indotineae by internal transcribed spacer sequence of ribosomal DNA. The lesions were refractory to treatment with topical luliconazole (LLCZ) cream for 4 weeks but subsided with oral itraconazole (ITCZ) 100 mg/day for 4 weeks in combination with topical lanoconazole (LCZ) cream. The lesions recurred 6 weeks after discontinuation of oral ITCZ, and an additional isolate was cultured. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimycotics for the isolate cultured at the first visit were: terbinafine (TBF) 0.03 μg/mL, ITCZ 0.015 μg/mL, LLCZ 0.0005 μg/mL, and LCZ 0.002 μg/mL. No TBF‐resistant mutation in the amino acid sequence of squalene epoxidase, i.e., Leu 393 Ser/Phe or Phe 397 Leu, was detected in the isolate. The reason for recalcitrance in this case, despite the isolate's sensitivity to antimycotics, was unclear. Possible factors include insufficient use of the antimycotics, incomplete removal of abundantly produced conidia from the lesions, the patient's environment, and a language gap between the patient and physician hindering communication.