Use of pudendal nerve blocks in rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids: an Australia‐wide cross‐sectional analysis

Author:

Watson Eleanor G. R.1ORCID,Ong Hwa Ian1ORCID,Proud David M.1,Mohan Helen M.1ORCID,Korda Rosemary J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery Austin Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health The Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSurgeons vary in their approach to preventing pain post rubber band ligation (RBL) of haemorrhoids, with pudendal nerve blocks (PNB) being one analgesic strategy. No data exists on how commonly PNBs are used in RBL in Australia, and whether use varies by year and patient and hospital characteristics.MethodsAggregate data from the National Hospital Morbidity Database was obtained for all admissions for RBL in Australia from 2012 to 2021, with and without a PNB, overall and in relation to sex, age group, hospital remoteness, hospital sector, and year of procedure. Adjusted relative risks (adj. RR) of PNB were estimated using Poisson regression, mutually adjusting for all variables.ResultsOf the 346 542 admissions for RBL, 14013 (4.04%) involved a PNB. The proportion of patients receiving a PNB increased between 2012–2013 and 2020–2021, from 1.62% to 6.63% (adj. RR 3.99, CI 3.64–4.36). Patients most likely to receive a PNB were female (adj. RR 1.10; CI 1.07–1.14) aged 25–34 years (adj. RR 1.13; CI 1.01–1.26); in major‐city (adj. RR 1.25 CI 1.20–1.30) and private hospitals (adj. RR 3.28 CI 3.13–3.45).ConclusionThis is the first published analysis of the use of PNB in RBL. Pudendal nerve block use has increased over time, with substantial variation in practice. Blocks were more than three times as likely to be used in private compared to public hospitals. If evidence supporting PNB use is established, equitable access to the procedure should be pursued.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3