The impact of jejunostomy feeding on nutritional outcomes after oesophagectomy

Author:

Davies Sarah J.123ORCID,Wheelwright Sally14

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences Southampton UK

2. Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cheltenham UK

3. Department of Dietitics/SLT University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK

4. Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE‐C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex Brighton UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNutritional status is compromised long‐term following oesophagectomy. Controversy surrounds the optimal route for nutrition support postoperatively and there is wide variation in the use of feeding jejunostomy tubes.MethodsA retrospective service evaluation was conducted for all consecutive adults who underwent oesophagectomy for a cancer diagnosis within a specialist centre between April 2016 and July 2019 (n = 165). Nutritional and clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received jejunostomy feeding (n = 24), versus those who did not (n = 141).ResultsPatients with feeding jejunostomy lost significantly less weight at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to those without jejunostomy (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This remained statistically significant in multiple regression, controlling for age, gender, preoperative tumour staging and adjuvant treatment (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Median length of home enteral feeding was 10 weeks after discharge in the jejunostomy group. We observed minor jejunostomy tube‐related complications in four patients (16.7%). Of those readmitted within 90 days of surgery in the non‐jejunostomy group, nutritional failure was a factor in 43.2% of these readmissions. “Rescue tube feeding” was required by 8.5% of the non‐jejunostomy group within the first postoperative year, including 6.4% within 90 days of surgery.ConclusionsUse of short‐term supplementary jejunal feeding in addition to oral intake after hospital discharge is beneficial for maintaining weight after oesophagectomy. We suggest a future randomised‐controlled trial to confirm these findings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference38 articles.

1. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

2. Cancer Research UK. Oesophageal cancer statistics [Internet].2019[cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:https://about-cancer.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/oesophageal-cancer/about

3. Oesophageal cancer

4. National Oesophago‐gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA). National Oesophago‐gastric Cancer Audit 2019 Report [Internet].2019[cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/12/REF150_NOGCA_2019-Annual-Report-FINAL_19Dec.pdf

5. Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3