A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth‐ and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo describe a new classification for intraoral scans based on the scan extension and to introduce a decision guideline to choose the scan extension for fabricating tooth‐ and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).OverviewMultiple operator‐ and patient‐related factors have been identified that can decrease the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs), including scan extension. However, the decision criteria for selecting scan extension for fabricating tooth‐ and implant‐supported restorations is unclear. Based on the extension of the intraoral digital scans, three types of scans can be defined: half‐arch (anterior or posterior), extended half‐arch, and complete‐arch scan. Variables to consider when choosing the scan extension include the number and location of units being restored, as well as the extension and location of edentulous areas. Additionally, the accuracy of the virtual definitive cast and the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured by using IOSs should be differentiated.ConclusionsA decision tree for selecting the scan extension is presented. The decision is based on the number and location of units being restored, and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with reduced scan extension are indicated when fabricating tooth‐ and implant‐supported crowns or short‐span fixed prostheses, when the patient does not have more than one missing tooth in the area of the dental arch included in the scan. For the remaining clinical conditions, complete‐arch intraoral scans are recommended.Clinical SignificanceScan extension is a clinician's decision that should be based on the number and location of units being restored and the extension and location of edentulous areas. Intraoral scans with a reduced scan extension is recommended, when possible.