Implant‐supported single all‐ceramic crowns made from prefabricated (stock) or individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: A 5 year randomized clinical trial

Author:

Wittneben Julia‐Gabriela123,Abou‐Ayash Samir2,Gashi Ardian1,Buser Daniel4ORCID,Belser Urs5,Brägger Urs2,Sailer Irena5,Gavric Jelena56

Affiliation:

1. Private Practice Zürich Switzerland

2. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

3. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

5. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

6. Private Practice Geneva Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this randomized, prospective, and clinical multicenter study was to compare the overall clinical performance of two restorative options over a 5‐year period: individualized CAD/CAM abutments veneered with a hand‐layered ceramic, and prefabricated zirconium dioxide abutments veneered with press ceramic and inserted into a single edentulous gap in the anterior maxilla.Materials and MethodsForty subjects were recruited from two universities: 20 from the University of XX and 20 from the University of XY. Each subject received an implant to restore a single edentulous gap in the maxillary anterior region (14–24 FDI). 20 patients were randomized into each Group. Group A received a one‐piece single crown produced from a prefabricated zirconia abutment with pressed ceramic and Group B received an individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutment with a hand‐layered technique. After 5 years, the aesthetic and radiographic parameters were assessed.ResultsGroup A had four dropouts and one failure, resulting in a 95% survival rate and 95% success rate. Group B had two dropouts and two failures which resulted in a 90% survival rate and 90% success rate. No crestal bone level changes were observed, with a mean DIB of 0.06 mm in Group A and 0.09 mm in Group B. No statistically significant differences were present at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, or 5 years for DIB values between time points and groups. Pink aesthetic score/white aesthetic score, Peri‐Implant and Crown Index, and Implant Crown Aesthetic Index values were stable over time at all five points for both groups.ConclusionBoth implant‐supported restorative options represent a valuable treatment option for the restoration of implant crowns in the anterior maxilla.Clinical SignificanceIn general, the use of ceramic abutments in the anterior zone represents a valuable treatment procedure with both standardized and CAD/CAM individualized abutments and following the recommendations from the respective manufacturer(s).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3