Experiences of interventions to reduce hospital stay for older adults following elective treatment: Qualitative evidence‐synthesis

Author:

Kinsey Debbie1,Carrieri Daniele1,Briscoe Simon1ORCID,Febrey Sam1,Kneale Dylan2,Lovegrove Chris3,Nunns Michael1ORCID,Coon Jo Thompson1,McGrath John4,Hemsley Anthony5,Shaw Liz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK

2. EPPI‐Centre, UCL Social Research Institute University College London London UK

3. School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health & Human Sciences University of Plymouth Plymouth UK

4. Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Exeter UK

5. Department of Healthcare for Older People Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust Exeter UK

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesHospitals streamline treatment pathways to reduce the length of time older adults admitted for planned procedures spend in hospital. However patient perspectives have been poorly evaluated. This systematic review aimed to understand the experiences of older patients, carers, families and staff of multi‐component interventions intended to improve recovery following elective treatment.Research Design and MethodsBibliographic databases searched in June 2021 included MEDLINE ALL, HMIC, CENTRAL, CINAHL, AMED and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. We conducted citation searching and examined reference lists of reviews. Two reviewers independently undertook screening and data extraction, resolving disagreements through discussion. We used an adapted Wallace checklist for quality appraisal and meta‐ethnography to synthesise data. Clinician, carer and patient views were incorporated throughout the review.ResultsThirty‐five papers were included in the synthesis. Thirteen studies were conducted in the UK, with patient views the most frequently represented. We identified six overarching constructs: ‘Home as preferred environment for recovery’, ‘Feeling safe’, ‘Individualisation of structured programme’, ‘Taking responsibility’, ‘Essential care at home’ and ‘Outcomes’.Discussion and ImplicationsFindings explore the support patients, families and carers need throughout hospital admission, and may inform commissioning of services to ensure patients and carers receive appropriate follow‐up support after hospital discharge. The findings may help hospital and community‐based health and social care staff provide person‐centred care based upon assessments of emotional and physical wellbeing of patients and family/carers. Research is needed to establish a core‐set of patient‐reported outcome measures which capture aspects of recovery which are meaningful to patients.

Funder

Health and Social Care Delivery Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3