Impact of the extent of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in clinically lymph node‐positive bladder cancer

Author:

von Deimling Markus12,Furrer Marc34ORCID,Mertens Laura S.5ORCID,Mari Andrea6ORCID,van Ginkel Noor5,Bacchiani Mara6,Maas Moritz78,Pichler Renate9ORCID,Li Roger10ORCID,Moschini Marco11ORCID,Bianchi Alberto12,Vetterlein Malte W.2,Lonati Chiara13ORCID,Crocetto Felice14,Taylor Jacob15,Tully Karl H.16ORCID,Afferi Luca17ORCID,Soria Francesco18ORCID,del Giudice Francesco19ORCID,Longoni Mattia11,Laukhtina Ekaterina1ORCID,Antonelli Alessandro12ORCID,Rink Michael2,Fisch Margit2,Lotan Yair15ORCID,Spiess Philippe E.10,Black Peter C.7,Kiss Bernhard3ORCID,Pradere Benjamin120,Shariat Shahrokh F.115212223,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

3. Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern University of Bern Bern Switzerland

4. Department of Urology Solothurner Spitäler AG Olten, Solothurn Switzerland

5. Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

6. Unit of Oncologic Minimally‐Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy

7. Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada

8. Department of Urology Eberhard Karls University Tübingen Tübingen Germany

9. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

10. Department of Genitourinary Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USA

11. Department of Urology Urological Research Institute Milan Italy

12. Department of Urology University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona Italy

13. Department of Urology Spedali Civili of Brescia Brescia Italy

14. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology University of Naples ‘Federico II’ Naples Italy

15. Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

16. Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne Ruhr‐University Bochum Herne Germany

17. Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Luzern Switzerland

18. Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Studies of Torino Turin Italy

19. Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital Rome Italy

20. Department of Urology Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint‐Fonsegrives France

21. Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al‐Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

22. Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

23. Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node‐positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa).Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin‐based peri‐operative chemotherapy for cTany N1‐3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity‐score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models.ResultsOf 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4–16) months, and median (IQR) follow‐up of alive patients was 30 (13–51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns (P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes.ConclusionPerforming an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3