Development of an instrument to measure the competencies of health professionals in the process of evidence‐based healthcare: A Delphi study

Author:

Wang Shuang12ORCID,Zhang Jiayi12ORCID,wang Lijie12ORCID,Liang Jin12ORCID,Wu Xiaofen3ORCID,Li Xiran4ORCID,Zhang Lili1ORCID,Wang Ning2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing Southern Medical University Guangzhou China

2. Centre for General Practice, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Southern Medical University Foshan China

3. Department of Nursing Puning People's Hospital (Affiliated Puning People's Hospital, Southern Medical University) Puning China

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine Third Military Medical University Southwest Hospital Chongqing China

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo identify and reach consensus on dimensions and criteria of a competence assessment instrument for health professionals in relation to the process of evidence‐based healthcare.DesignA two‐round Delphi survey was carried out from April to June 2023.MethodsConsensus was sought from an expert panel on the instrument preliminarily established based on the JBI Model of Evidence‐Based Healthcare and a rapid review of systematic reviews of relevant literature. The level of consensus was reflected by the concentration and coordination of experts' opinions and percentage of agreement. The instrument was revised significantly based on the combination of data analysis, the experts' comments and research group discussions.ResultsSixteen national and three international experts were involved in the first‐round Delphi survey and 17 experts participated in the second‐round survey. In both rounds, full consensus was reached on the four dimensions of the instrument, namely evidence‐generation, evidence‐synthesis, evidence‐transfer and evidence‐implementation. In round‐one, the instrument was revised from 77 to 61 items. In round‐two, the instrument was further revised to have 57 items under the four dimensions in the final version.ConclusionThe Delphi survey achieved consensus on the instrument. The validity and reliability of the instrument needs to be tested in future research internationally.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareSystematic assessment of nurses and other health professionals' competencies in different phases of evidence‐based healthcare process based on this instrument provides implications for their professional development and multidisciplinary team collaboration in evidence‐based practice and better care process and outcomes.ImpactThis study addresses a research gap of lacking an instrument to systematically assess interprofessional competencies in relation to the process of EBHC. The instrument covers the four phases of EBHC process with minimal criteria, highlighting essential aspects of ability to be developed. Identification of health professionals' level of competence in these aspects helps strengthen their capacity accordingly so as to promote virtuous EBHC ecosystem for the ending purpose of improving global healthcare outcomes.Reporting MethodThis study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDES) guidance on Delphi studies.Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3