Euvolemic automated transfusion to treat severe anemia in sickle cell disease patients at risk of circulatory overload

Author:

Mercure‐Corriveau Nicolas1,Crowe Elizabeth P.1ORCID,Vozniak Sonja1,Feng Xinyi1,Rai Herleen1,Van Denakker Tayler1ORCID,Zakieh Abdulhafiz2,Grabowski M. Kate1,Lanzkron Sophie3,Tobian Aaron A. R.1ORCID,Bloch Evan M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

2. Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

3. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusion remains a major treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients with SCD have a high prevalence of renal impairment and cardiorespiratory disease, conferring risk of transfusion‐associated circulatory overload (TACO).Study Design and MethodsWe describe an approach, titled euvolemic automated transfusion (EAT), to transfuse SCD patients with severe anemia who are at risk of TACO. In EAT, plasmapheresis is performed using donor RBCs, rather than albumin or plasma, as replacement fluid. Euvolemia is maintained. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who underwent EAT at our institution over a 10‐year period, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EAT.ResultsEleven SCD patients underwent 109 EAT procedures (1–59 procedures per patient). The median age was 42 years (IQR = [30–49]) and 82% (n = 9) were female. Most (82%; n = 9) patients had severe chronic kidney disease and 55% (n = 6) had heart failure. One (9%) patient had a history of life‐threatening TACO. Mean pre‐ and post‐procedure Hct values were 19.8% (SD ± 1.6%) and 29.1% (SD ± 1.4%), respectively. The average Hct increment was 3.2% per RBC unit. Only two EAT‐related complications were recorded during the 109 procedures: central line‐associated infection and citrate toxicity (muscle cramping). EAT used an average of two RBC units less than that projected for standard automated RBC exchange.ConclusionOur findings suggest that EAT is safe and effective to treat patients with SCD and severe anemia, who are at risk for TACO. EAT requires fewer RBC units compared to automated RBC exchange.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3