Association between pulp and periapical disease with type 2 diabetes: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization

Abstract

AbstractAimThis current Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to comprehensively explore the potential bidirectional link between pulp and periapical disease (PAP) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodologySummary level data of European‐based population genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) were employed to undertake this MR study. With the selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as the instrumental variable, the radial inverse‐variance weighted (radial IVW) method with modified second‐order weights was applied as the primary method. Additionally, a range of sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate pleiotropy. Results from different sources of outcome were pooled by meta‐analysis with the fixed model.ResultsThe results of this MR analysis did not suggest a significant impact of pulp and periapical disease on type 2 diabetes (combined OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00–1.07, p = .033) and vice versa (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.96–1.14, p = .329). No significant pleiotropy was detected in the final model after the removal of outliers, demonstrating the reliability of the results in our primary analysis.ConclusionsWith the limitations inherent in the present MR study, there is no significant evidence in either direction to suggest a causal association between pulp and periapical disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.