Postoperative recovery in preschool‐aged children: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing premedication with midazolam, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine

Author:

Bromfalk Åsa1ORCID,Hultin Magnus1ORCID,Myrberg Tomi2ORCID,Engström Åsa3ORCID,Walldén Jakob4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Umeå University Umeå Sweden

2. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Sunderbyn) Umeå University Umeå Sweden

3. Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology Lulea University of Technology Luleå Sweden

4. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Sundsvall) Umeå University Umeå Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPreoperative anxiety in pediatric patients can worsen postoperative outcomes and delay discharge. Drugs aimed at reducing preoperative anxiety and facilitating postoperative recovery are available; however, their effects on postoperative recovery from propofol‐remifentanil anesthesia have not been studied in preschool‐aged children. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effects of three sedative premedications on postoperative recovery from total intravenous anesthesia in children aged 2–6 years.MethodsIn this prespecified secondary analysis of a double‐blinded randomized trial, 90 children scheduled for ear, nose, and throat surgery were randomized (1:1:1) to receive sedative premedication: oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, oral clonidine 4 μg/kg, or intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg. Using validated instruments, outcome measures including time for readiness to discharge from the postoperative care unit, postoperative sedation, emergence delirium, anxiety, pain, and nausea/vomiting were measured.ResultsAfter excluding eight children due to drug refusal or deviation from the protocol, 82 children were included in this study. No differences were found between the groups in terms of median time [interquartile range] to readiness for discharge (midazolam, 90 min [48]; clonidine, 80 min [46]; dexmedetomidine 100.5 min [42]). Compared to the midazolam group, logistic regression with a mixed model and repeated measures approach found no differences in sedation, less emergence delirium, and less pain in the dexmedetomidine group, and less anxiety in both clonidine and dexmedetomidine groups.ConclusionsNo statistical difference was observed in the postoperative recovery times between the premedication regimens. Compared with midazolam, dexmedetomidine was favorable in reducing both emergence delirium and pain in the postoperative care unit, and both clonidine and dexmedetomidine reduced anxiety in the postoperative care unit. Our results indicated that premedication with α2‐agonists had a better recovery profile than short‐acting benzodiazepines; although the overall recovery time in the postoperative care unit was not affected.

Funder

Medicinska fakulteten, Umeå Universitet

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3