Changing US Support for Public Health Data Use Through Pandemic and Political Turmoil

Author:

SCHMIT CASON D.1ORCID,LARSON BRIAN N.2,TANABE THOMAS12,RAMEZANI MAHIN13,ZHENG QI1,KUM HYE‐CHUNG1

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health Texas A&M University

2. School of Law Texas A&M University

3. Transportation Institute Texas A&M University

Abstract

Policy Points This study examines the impact of several world‐changing events in 2020, such as the pandemic and widespread racism protests, on the US population's comfort with the use of identifiable data for public health. Before the 2020 election, there was no significant difference between Democrats and Republicans. However, African Americans exhibited a decrease in comfort that was different from other subgroups. Our findings suggest that the public remained supportive of public health data activities through the pandemic and the turmoil of 2020 election cycle relative to other data use. However, support among African Americans for public health data use experienced a unique decline compared to other demographic groups. ContextRecent legislative privacy efforts have not included special provisions for public health data use. Although past studies documented support for public health data use, several global events in 2020 have raised awareness and concern about privacy and data use. This study aims to understand whether the events of 2020 affected US privacy preferences on secondary uses of identifiable data, focusing on public health and research uses.MethodsWe deployed two online surveys—in February and November 2020—on data privacy attitudes and preferences using a choice‐based–conjoint analysis. Participants received different data‐use scenario pairs—varied by the type of data, user, and purpose—and selected scenarios based on their comfort. A hierarchical Bayes regression model simulated population preferences.FindingsThere were 1,373 responses. There was no statistically significant difference in the population's data preferences between February and November, each showing the highest comfort with population health and research data activities and the lowest with profit‐driven activities. Most subgroups’ data preferences were comparable with the population's preferences, except African Americans who showed significant decreases in comfort with population health and research.ConclusionsDespite world‐changing events, including a pandemic, we found bipartisan public support for using identifiable data for public health and research. The decreasing support among African Americans could relate to the increased awareness of systemic racism, its harms, and persistent disparities. The US population's preferences support including legal provisions that permit public health and research data use in US laws, which are currently lacking specific public health use permissions.

Funder

Texas A and M University

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. International Association of Privacy Professionals.Privacy matters in the US States.2022. Accessed February 16 2023.https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/infographic_privacy_matters_in_the_us_states.pdf

2. American Data Privacy and Protection Act HR 8152 117th Cong 2nd Sess (2022).

3. Privacy and Confidentiality of Public Health Information

4. Cross Sector Data Sharing: Necessity, Challenge, and Hope

5. US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences: Impeding Public Health and Research (Preprint)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3