Policy education in a research‐focused doctoral nursing program: Power as knowing participation in change

Author:

Perry Donna J.1ORCID,Cintron Saisha1,Grace Pamela J.2ORCID,Jones Dorothy A.34,Kane Anne T.1,Kennedy Heather M.1,Malinski Violet M.5,Mar William1,Toohey Lauri1

Affiliation:

1. UMass Chan Medical School, Tan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing Worcester Massachusetts USA

2. William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts USA

3. Marjory Gordon Program for Clinical Reasoning and Knowledge Development, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts USA

4. Yvonne L. Munn Center for Nursing Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Hunter College of Nursing & Graduate Center City University of New York New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractNurses have moral obligations incurred by membership in the profession to participate knowingly in health policy advocacy. Many barriers have historically hindered nurses from realizing their potential to advance health policy. The contemporary political context sets additional challenges to policy work due to polarization and conflict. Nursing education can help nurses recognize their role in advancing health through political advocacy in a manner that is consistent with disciplinary knowledge and ethical responsibilities. In this paper, the authors describe an exemplar of Elizabeth Barrett's “Power as Knowing Participation in Change” theory as a disciplinary lens within a doctoral nursing health policy course. Barrett (radically) emphasizes “power as freedom” instead of “power as control.” This approach is congruent with nursing disciplinary values and enhances awareness of personal freedom and building collaborative relationships in the policy process. The theory was used in concert with other traditional policy content and frameworks from nursing and other disciplines. We discuss the role of nursing ethics viewed as professional responsibility for policy action, an overview of Barrett's theory, and the design of the course. Four student reflections on how the course influenced their thinking about policy advocacy are included. While not specific to policymaking, Barrett's theory provides a disciplinary grounding to increase students' awareness of freedom and choices in political advocacy participation. Our experience suggests that Barrett's work can be fruitful for enhancing nurses' awareness of choices to participate in change across settings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Reference42 articles.

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2022).The research‐focused doctoral program in nursing: Pathways to excellence.https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Position-Statements/Pathways-Excellence-Position-Statement.pdf

2. American Nurses Association. (2015).Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. NurseBooks.https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/

3. Preventing extreme polarization of political attitudes

4. A Rogerian Practice Methodology for Health Patterning

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3