Pharmacogenomics polygenic risk score: Ready or not for prime time?

Author:

Singh Sonal1ORCID,Stocco Gabriele23ORCID,Theken Katherine N.4ORCID,Dickson Alyson5ORCID,Feng QiPing5ORCID,Karnes Jason H.67ORCID,Mosley Jonathan D.57ORCID,El Rouby Nihal89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Merck & Co., Inc South San Francisco California USA

2. Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences University of Trieste Trieste Italy

3. Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste Italy

4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Pharmacology, School of Dental Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

6. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA

7. Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

8. Division of Pharmacy Practice and Adminstrative Sciences, James L Winkle College of Pharmacy University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

9. St. Elizabeth Healthcare Edgewood Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractPharmacogenomic Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) have emerged as a tool to address the polygenic nature of pharmacogenetic phenotypes, increasing the potential to predict drug response. Most pharmacogenomic PRS have been extrapolated from disease‐associated variants identified by genome wide association studies (GWAS), although some have begun to utilize genetic variants from pharmacogenomic GWAS. As pharmacogenomic PRS hold the promise of enabling precision medicine, including stratified treatment approaches, it is important to assess the opportunities and challenges presented by the current data. This assessment will help determine how pharmacogenomic PRS can be advanced and transitioned into clinical use. In this review, we present a summary of recent evidence, evaluate the current status, and identify several challenges that have impeded the progress of pharmacogenomic PRS. These challenges include the reliance on extrapolations from disease genetics and limitations inherent to pharmacogenomics research such as low sample sizes, phenotyping inconsistencies, among others. We finally propose recommendations to overcome the challenges and facilitate the clinical implementation. These recommendations include standardizing methodologies for phenotyping, enhancing collaborative efforts, developing new statistical methods to capitalize on drug‐specific genetic associations for PRS construction. Additional recommendations include enhancing the infrastructure that can integrate genomic data with clinical predictors, along with implementing user‐friendly clinical decision tools, and patient education. Ethical and regulatory considerations should address issues related to patient privacy, informed consent and safe use of PRS. Despite these challenges, ongoing research and large‐scale collaboration is likely to advance the field and realize the potential of pharmacogenomic PRS.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3