Research on commercial milk formulas for young children: A scoping review

Author:

Cavalcanti Maria Birman1ORCID,Silva Isabela da Costa Gaspar da2ORCID,Lamarca Fernando3ORCID,de Castro Inês Rugani Ribeiro4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social Medicine Institute State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

2. National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca Rio de Janeiro Brazil

3. Department of Applied Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

4. Institute of Nutrition State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Abstract

AbstractA scoping review of publications about commercial milk formulas intended for or consumed by children 12–36 months (CMF 12–36) was conducted. This review aimed to comprehensively map the existing literature, identify key concepts in the field and understand its evolution through time. A total of 3329 articles were screened and 220 were included, published between 1986 and 2024. Most works were published after 2016 (70.0%) and in high‐income countries (71.8%). Original studies were the vast majority (81.8%) of publications. Most publications dealt with feeding practices or analysed the composition and/or contamination of specific products (44.1% and 35.9%), but since the late 2000s, publications about marketing, policy, legislation, and consumer perception started to appear. Most published works (65.5%) did not focus exclusively on CMF 12–36 and included formulas for other demographics or other foods. About half of the works (55.5%) did not consider CMF 12–36 to be a breast milk substitute. We found 81 distinct product denominations used to refer to CMF 12–36, Growing Up Milk was the most common (25.9%). CMF industry was involved in 41.8% of all analysed works, and industry participation and funding were not always clearly informed (22.5% lacked a conflict of interest statement, and 25.5% did not present any information about funding). In the last decade, publications about CMF 12–36 have increased in volume and diversified in scope and subject matter. CMF‐industry participation has always been and still is present in the field, so possible vested interests should be taken into account when appreciating the literature.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3