The fluid voter: Exploring independent voting patterns over time

Author:

Reilly Thom1ORCID,Hunting Dan2

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Affairs Arizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA

2. Lodestar Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Innovation Arizona State University Arizona Phoenix USA

Abstract

AbstractIndependents remain hard to categorize because they are, by their choice of self‐identification, resisting the standard categories of political classification. Despite the growth in independent voter identity, many political strategists still view independents as partisans. In this article, we contribute to the academic literature on independent voting behavior by exploring whether those who identify as politically independent function as true independents by accounting for their voting patterns over time. We do this by analyzing data produced by the American National Election Studies (ANES) on political identification and voting choices from 1972 to 2020 on each of the three ANES measures of party affiliation. Our findings show when tracking independent voting behavior over more than one election, there is a significant volatility in voting loyalty and independents as a group are distinct from partisans. This volatility was observed in all three measures of party affiliation used by the ANES survey data. The research also finds evidence that a sizeable number of independents move in and out of independent status from one election to another.Related ArticlesGrossmann, Matt. 2014. “The Varied Effects of Policy Cues on Partisan Opinions.” Politics & Policy 42(6): 881–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12102.Reilly, Thom, and E. C. Hedberg. 2022. “Social Networks of Independents and Partisans: Are Independents a Moderating Forcer?” Politics & Policy 50(2): 225–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12460.Saeki, Manabu. 2019. “Anatomy of Party Sorting: Partisan Polarization of Voters and Party Switching.” Politics & Policy 47(4): 699–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12318.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference34 articles.

1. Abrams Samuel J. andMorris P.Fiorina.2011.“Are Leaning Independents Deluded or Dishonest Weak Partisans?”https://cise.luiss.it/cise/wp‐content/uploads/2011/10/Are‐Leaners‐Partisans.pdf.

2. ANES Data Center.2015. “Party Identification 3‐Point Scale (Revised in 2008) 1952‐2012.”American National Election Studies.https://electionstudies.org/resources/anes‐guide/top‐tables/?id=22.

3. ANES Data Center.2021.“American National Election Studies.”https://electionstudies.org/data‐center/.

4. ANES Data Center. n.d. “Time Series Cumulative Data File.”American National Election Studies.https://electionstudies.org/data‐center/anes‐time‐series‐cumulative‐data‐file/.

5. Bitzer J. Michael Christopher A.Cooper Whitney RossManzo andSusanRoberts.2021 November 4–5.“The Rise of the Unaffiliated Voter in North Carolina.”Prepared for Presentation at the State if the Parties 2020 and Beyond Virtual Conference. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Note from the Editors;Politics & Policy;2023-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3