Microaneurysm detection using high‐speed megahertz optical coherence tomography angiography in advanced diabetic retinopathy

Author:

Huber Kim Lien1ORCID,Stino Heiko1ORCID,Schlegl Thomas2,Steiner Irene3,Nagy Gergely1,Niederleithner Michael2,Baumann Bernhard2,Drexler Wolfgang2,Leitgeb Rainer A.2,Schmidt‐Erfurth Ursula1ORCID,Schmoll Tilman24,Pollreisz Andreas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria

3. Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Medical Statistics Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

4. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Dublin California USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare detection rates of microaneurysms (MAs) on high‐speed megahertz optical coherence tomography angiography (MHz‐OCTA), fluorescein angiography (FA) and colour fundus photography (CF) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).MethodsFor this exploratory cross‐sectional study, MHz‐OCTA data were acquired with a swept‐source OCT prototype (A‐scan rate: 1.7 MHz), and FA and CF imaging was performed using Optos® California. MA count was manually evaluated on en face MHz‐OCTA/FA/CF images within an extended ETDRS grid. Detectability of MAs visible on FA images was evaluated on corresponding MHz‐OCTA and CF images. MA distribution and leakage were correlated with detectability on OCTA and CF imaging.Results47 eyes with severe DR (n = 12) and proliferative DR (n = 35) were included. MHz‐OCTA and CF imaging detected on average 56% and 36% of MAs, respectively. MHz‐OCTA detection rate was significantly higher than CF (p < 0.01). The combination of MHz‐OCTA and CF leads to an increased detection rate of 70%. There was no statistically significant association between leakage and MA detectability on OCTA (p = 0.13). For CF, the odds of detecting leaking MAs were significantly lower than non‐leaking MAs (p = 0.012). Using MHz‐OCTA, detection of MAs outside the ETDRS grid was less likely than MAs located within the ETDRS grid (outer ring, p < 0.01; inner ring, p = 0.028). No statistically significant difference between rings was observed for CF measurements.ConclusionsMore MAs were detected on MHz‐OCTA than on CF imaging. Detection rate was lower for MAs located outside the macular region with MHz‐OCTA and for leaking MAs with CF imaging. Combining both non‐invasive modalities can improve MA detection.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3