Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Vitai Viktória12ORCID,Németh Anna12,Teutsch Brigitta134,Kelemen Kata12,Fazekas Alíz1,Hegyi Péter135,Németh Orsolya16,Kerémi Beáta17,Borbély Judit12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Translational Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

2. Department of Prosthodontics Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

3. Institute of Pancreatic Diseases Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

4. Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

5. Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

6. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Community Dentistry Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

7. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveThis systematic review and meta‐analysis compared the accuracy of intraoral scanners and spectrophotometers in determining tooth shade.Materials and MethodsAn electronic search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was conducted on October 19, 2023. A total of 163 studies were identified from the databases, of which 23 articles were eligible for inclusion. In vivo and in vitro quasi‐experimental studies were included. After data extraction, a quantitative analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the intraoral scanner in subgroups using four outcomes: trueness and precision with different measurement locations. A random‐effects model was used to pool effect sizes. The pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for the effect size measure.ResultsEleven articles were included in the meta‐analysis. Trueness with the intraoral scanner was between 0.28 (CI: 0.09–0.60) and 0.38 (CI: 0.24–0.53). Repeatability was between 0.81 (CI: 0.64–0.91) and 0.85 (CI: 0.74–0.92). Trueness showed low, and precision had moderate certainty of evidence.ConclusionThe trueness of shade matching with intraoral scanners is low compared to spectrophotometers, although the precision is considered high and is similar to spectrophotometers.Clinical SignificanceShade determination with intraoral scanners is not recommended.

Funder

Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3